Flood management plan badly flawed
Published on 28th June 2007 in Letters
Sir - After studying the Aire Catchment Flood Management Plan I find it totally flawed in respect of the Upper and Lower catchment areas.
To assume that water levels are going to rise in future is unproven, they are accepting the advice of scientific cranks. Not to consult with other River Authorities (Ouse, Don, Went) seems incongruous, if their plans are as incompetent as those of the Aire Management Plan.
The inhabitants of Goole and Selby are doomed whether water levels rise or not if protection ceases as suggested by the river Aire planners in the Upper and Lower catchment areas.
If the million inhabitants of central Yorkshire are to be protected, they should at least have to pay for the inconvenience and losses caused to the minority, in my opinion, as the Department of the Environment admits that it has no direct funding for any compensation.
As world cereal reserves go below 30 days' supply, taking out up to 0.5 tons of production with the reformation of Humber Lake as it was 10,000 years ago does not seem to make sense either.
What is the problem with continuing the current level of protection and not pre-judging the future?
J. R. Everatt
Station Road,
Carlton
Related Articles
Flood talks for MP
Goole MP Ian Cawsey recently met Peter Holmes from the Environment Agency (EA) to discuss the response to recent flooding and the EA's plans for flood defences in future.
Flood plans slammed
Goole's prospective Conservative MP Andrew Percy this week slammed the Environment Agency's controversial plans to increase flooding in the Snaith, Airmyn, Rawcliffe and Gowda
- Objections raised over flood plan proposals
- Mixed reaction over flood plan
- First meeting for flooding group
- Flood plan emergency meeting
- FLOOD PLEDGE: SNAITH WILL NOT SUFFER
- Snaith flood plan delay shock
- Defence plans to be discussed
- Flood plans still only in draft phase
- Flood plans debate at town council meeting
- Environment agency invite to flood meeting